<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Development of Perspective Taking : a pre-requisite for different stages of Moral Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-mouse-trap.com/2006/08/22/development-of-perspective-taking-a-pre-requisite-for-different-stages-of-moral-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-mouse-trap.com/2006/08/22/development-of-perspective-taking-a-pre-requisite-for-different-stages-of-moral-development/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:55:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Rosemary LYNDALL WEMM</title>
		<link>http://the-mouse-trap.com/2006/08/22/development-of-perspective-taking-a-pre-requisite-for-different-stages-of-moral-development/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosemary LYNDALL WEMM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 08:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-mouse-trap.com/?p=40#comment-245</guid>
		<description>Psychologists themselves are not immune from the moral dilemmas of Stage 5.  A modern day example can be seen here:  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://psybird.wordpress.com  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The first &quot;hot case&quot; is especially interesting, particularly the differing opinions about the psychologists conviction for contempt of court.  Was it moral or was it immoral?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Psychologists themselves are not immune from the moral dilemmas of Stage 5.  A modern day example can be seen here:  </p>
<p><a href="http://psybird.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://psybird.wordpress.com</a>  </p>
<p>The first &#8220;hot case&#8221; is especially interesting, particularly the differing opinions about the psychologists conviction for contempt of court.  Was it moral or was it immoral?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

